Syrians were interested in discussing local reconciliation efforts, and they dis
Syrians were interested in discussing local reconciliation efforts, and they displayed a surprising degree of agreement on the structure of such processes, despite their doubts about whether reconciliation efforts are even possible or acceptable now. Opposition supporters tended to regard the moderate rebels, and specifically the Free Syrian Army (FSA), as the most desirable primary representative in any talks if they were to talk to the government at all. Government supporters were also open to inclusive negotiations, but added provisos: the opposition must be Syrians; only unarmed groups can participate; and President Assad’s government must lead the talks. Significantly, both pro and anti-regime participants signaled support for respected community leaders to function as potential mediators in local negotiations. Furthermore, despite the mistrust between the pro- and anti-regime elements, many participants were open to efforts to begin rebuilding local government structures.
Opposition: FSA Should Take the Lead
Many regime opponents felt their natural choice to lead local negotiations should be the rebels in general, and in particular the FSA, as they considered it the leading fighting force against the regime.
If by armed, you mean the rebels and free individuals, then yes they have to participate (in talks). But the rest of the organizations must cease to exist, because the Free Syrian Army is the voice of the Syrian people, but with a gun.
— Sunni man (anti-regime), 29, Deir al-Zor
Until they bring another regime to rule this country, our representative is the Free Syrian Army and we can negotiate with them, but not with this ruling regime.
— Sunni man (anti-regime) 27, Aleppo
Regime Supporters Favor Inclusive Talks
Many regime supporters were open to the idea of including opponents in local-level negotiations, on the condition that they are Syrians and unarmed, and that the talks are led by the government.
All (local) negotiations should include people from all Syrian categories, the decision makers, and those who are concerned for the wellbeing of Syria. There is no place for armed groups who have killed Syrian people in these negotiations; they should only be put on trial.
— Kurdish man (pro-regime), 32, Al-Hasakah
Reputable people in all areas and neighborhoods should participate, and people who care about safety, stability, and the best interest of the country, not their own best interest. The government should try to understand them but be careful when dealing with them. It is in the opponents’ best interest to negotiate with the regime to settle the conflict and stop their violent acts.
— Christian man (pro-regime), 28, Damascus
The willingness to discuss local negotiations on both sides is encouraging; however, the fact that the opposition sees the FSA as its leading representative while the pro-government side rejects armed opposition groups in the talks could be a stumbling-block unless alternative negotiation channels or proxies