21 What is the difference between being authorless and being unauthored?
21 What is the difference between being authorless and being unauthored?
While reading a friend’s memoir of her father’s imprisonment under the Romanian dictatorship, I come across a few lines that force me to pause. There is an invisible caesura in the text: a space where the past ruptures the continuity of narrative. In early December 1989, this friend, Carmen Bugan, arrived in the U.S. with her family. They were given asylum as political refugees from Nicolae Ceaușescu’s dictatorship. Photo taken by Radu Sigeti/Reuters.[1]
In these newsreels, the dictator looks down from a balcony at the staged demonstration of support. The image shifts—a few boos from the crowd alter the site of the spectacle —a flash of surprise crosses the dictator’s face. And then, the dictator continues speaking. He warns the crowds that “fascist agitators” in Timisoara are trying to destroy Romanian socialism.
The controlled fiction of utopia is replaced by the controlled screening of an internal coup staged by Communist Party members. But for now, the usual scripts are upended.
Who wrote the revolution?
Was it authored by the Romanian people rising up against the dictator?
Was it authored by the international media that placed the event alongside similar uprisings in other Eastern bloc states?
Was it co-created by Party apparatchiks and prominent writers and artists who wanted reform?
Was it scripted? If so, who wrote the script? And which parts were left to improvisation?
Who knew a script existed?
These films and photographs commit me to a materialist history, or one that knows the story of an object can never be told completely or exhaustively unless time stops. As long as time continues, the object will be available for conversations with others. The object will continue speaking. There is no definitive, final story.
You asked about authorlessness, a subject that implicates textuality itself in relation to how we describe authorship. The author is the name to which a particular story is credited. But writers often think in dialogue with other writers whom they have read. We don’t make the world from scratch again with every text: we simply decide who to invite into it. Maybe each book is a room that gets written so certain conversations can take place?
In this view, quotation is a means of expanding the temporal possibilities of the conversation within a text. Walter Benjamin‘s unfinished book, The Arcades Project, used montage as a form in which to curate a social and visual history of 19th century Paris. By assembling a collection of fragments, images, and textual scraps, Benjamin served as both curator and author of the materials originally made by others. The pictures of Paris resemble postcards or quotations from the public images that circulated among Parisians then. Images are knowledge that attach to memories and evoke recognition.
Since the book was never published in Benjamin’s lifetime, we don’t have his final word on how the book should end. But the na