← Back to Book Detail

7. Web Accessibility Reporting (56/34) -- Professional Web Accessibility Auditing ...

Browse
164%

7. Web Accessibility Reporting

7. Web Accessibility Reporting Informal Reviews An informal review is a quick scan of a website to identify obvious accessibility issues. While these reviews do not represent exhaustive audits, they are useful for a variety of purposes. Purpose of Review An informal review is often attached to a quote for a formal accessibility audit, providing some introductory information to a client to give them a better idea of the types of issues on their website before they commit to the formal review. An informal review can be helpful in justifying a formal review. Process of Review Informal reviews often occur as part of a conversation, perhaps with a member of an organization who is responsible for managing an organization’s image, or with a developer who is planning or reviewing design activities. These reviews will often involve a couple of quick tests, like the Tab Key Navigation test, or passing a page through an automated accessibility checker, or quickly examining the code where suspected issues may be present, or running a page through a screen reader. These quick reviews often turn up a number of potential barriers that help get a discussion started on next steps toward making web content accessible. Reporting Results from the Review The following is an example of the types of issues that might be documented in an informal review. Characteristics of an informal review could include (in this example): - Type of site: a registration system with integrated eCommerce - Timing of review: prior to going live - Duration of review: about 30 minutes - Audience: the developer of the User Interface (UI) created over a third party eCommerce system - Style of Report: - Provided by email to the developer and the developer’s management team - Brief and succinct - Written in a way that the developer would understand, already being familiar with the UI, and already being familiar with the technical language being used - A few non-accessibility related issues identified as a courtesy - Not too detailed if the review is intended to elicit a formal review Sample Informal Review by Email Hi John, Here’s a quick summary of the potential issues found on your registration site. If you like, we can arrange a time to talk about these issues, and the possibility of conducting a formal review that will address these and other potential issues in more detail to ensure that as many people as possible are able to access your site and to register. I’ve identified some issues and offered suggestions for possible fixes where applicable: - Associate labels with form fields by matching the for attribute in the label with the id attribute in the input element. - Add aria-required="true" to the required input fields. - Use aria-describedby="[id]" to associate the description in the hidden spans with the respective input field. - The Yes/No inputs look like checkboxes, but function like radio buttons. Maybe not an issue, but inconsistent with what most people might expect. - For the f
← Previous Chapter Next Chapter →