42
Biography of Bertrand Russell
Bertrand Russell (1872–1970) was a British philosopher, mathematician, and social critic. He made significant contributions to the fields of philosophy, mathematics, and political activism. Russell’s groundbreaking work on the foundations of mathematics, along with Alfred North Whitehead, established him as a leading mathematician. He later became a prominent philosopher, advocating for logical analysis to clarify philosophical problems.
Beyond his intellectual pursuits, Russell was a passionate activist. He vehemently opposed war and militarism, even facing imprisonment for his pacifist beliefs during World War I. Throughout his life, he actively engaged in political causes, championing social justice, human rights, and nuclear disarmament. Russell’s writings, such as Unpopular Essays, reflected his commitment to freedom of thought and expression.
Russell’s legacy encompasses his tireless pursuit of truth, rationality, and social justice. His contributions to literature and philosophy earned him the Nobel Prize in Literature in 1950. His influential works, including The Problems of Philosophy and A History of Western Philosophy, continue to inspire thinkers and activists today. Bertrand Russell’s intellectual and moral convictions left an indelible mark on the twentieth century’s intellectual landscape
Bertrand Russell – On Anti-Suffragist Arguments
Anti-Suffragist Anxieties
The arguments against women’s suffrage were, until lately, by no means easy to discover. For, though much had been written and spoken in its favour, opponents still felt themselves securely entrenched behind the ramparts of prejudice and custom, and did not think it necessary or prudent to venture on the open ground of explicit discussion. Now, however, owing to the activities of the Anti-Suffrage League and the writings of an eminent Professor,1 it has become possible to discover what are the reasons for opposition which it is thought wise to avow. It must be confessed that they do not make a very formidable array, and that many of them are old friends which have done duty against every reform since the ancient Britons first ceased to dye themselves with woad. But such as they are, they deserve examination. In this examination, Professor Dicey’s book will afford a useful text.
We will begin, as the Professor himself does, with minor arguments which have not much persuasive power in themselves, but serve to raise a prejudice or a presumption which may make the reader more receptive when he comes to the really serious objections.
“The concession of Parliamentary votes to women,” we are told, “must be in the United Kingdom, either for good or bad, a revolution” (p. 10). Certainly we must admit that it shares this distinction with the Budget and flying-machines and wireless telegraphy and most other things. But that alone would not, at first sight, have any bearing on the question whether this revolution was for good or for bad; yet it is supposed