18
After the Online Petition to Return the Whistleblower Kids had been removed and my three Facebook accounts deleted, I thought I’d try www.meetup.com to get the community of people who cared about the case to collaborate more effectively.
I am member of 42 technical groups and have attended lots of events in London thanks to this excellent platform.
I used the PAGES facility to collect Witness Statements in view of an appeal against the judgement that Justice Pauffley had published on 19 March 2014.
The appeal was being handled by the solicitor who had come forward to protect and defend me. We persuaded Ella to use him, after she had, quite understandably, lost all faith in all lawyers.
But as mentioned earlier, Justice Pauffley saw a ‘conflict of interests’ arising due to him representing both of us, so he is no longer helping me.
We have to be realistic and state that the outcome of the appeal has already been determined, just as it was with Pauffley’s ‘fact finding hearing’. The system has decided what it wants – these children – and is going to do whatever it takes to get them, including trampling justice. Pauffley is just the tool the system is using to get this done, and this can be seen in the fact that she also presided over another, similar case, in which the same sort of injustices were done to victims, and similar preferences were given to abusers: the Hollie Greig case in Scotland.
In actual fact, the witness statements we gathered are evidence of the intelligence and dedication of the internet community that Mrs Justice Pauffley slanderously called ‘evil and/or foolish’.
The most prestigious witness statement came from Alfred Lambremont Webre, a retired Canadian professor of law and radio show host:
Extract from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Fouxy51AIo
“There were no witnesses who could tell the truth at this judicial proceeding … You [Ella] were not present to tell the full story of your children’s participation in what appears to be what we’ve unearthed is a paedophile and ritual child sacrifice hub in Hampstead.
This is really the first opportunity in the court of public opinion. This is serving as a first instance to get these facts and your testimony on the record, which should have happened, if this judge had been an honest judge and not corrupted, and this court had been an honest proceeding.
And I say this as an attorney as a former law professor at two universities and as a judge in international proceedings. This is disgraceful: The conduct of this court by any international standard is disgraceful.”
– Alfred Lambremont Webre, Attorney and Radio Show Host
1. This 3-page complaint focuses on the fact that a Serious Fraud was committed in a Police Investigation which was perpetuated by the High Court Judge, even though she spotted it!
The details are that on 04.09.14 the couple reported the childrens’ allegations informally to Abraham’s brother-in-law, Mr Jean-Clement Yaohirou. He passed the audio recording of their meet