← Back to Book Detail

Benefits and Challenges of Participatory M&E (14/12) -- Building Sustainable Communities: Monito...

Browse
116%

Benefits and Challenges of Participatory M&E

Benefits and Challenges of Participatory M&E Benefits of Participatory M&E PM&E encourages local communities to build adaptive capacity. Participants involved are able to gain skills which strengthen local capacities for tasks such as resource management or planning, problem solving, and collaborative decision-making (Jackson & Kassam, 1998; Onyango, 2018). Participants also develop a greater understanding of the factors (internal or external), which affect the dynamics of a project, such as successes, failures, potential solutions, or alternative actions (Campos & Coupal, 1996 in Estrella & Gaventa, 1998). The focus of PM&E as a learning opportunity is also significant (Margoluis & Salafsky, 1998; Selin et al., 2000). In order to achieve sustainability under conditions of socio-ecological change, continuous learning in community initiatives is crucial (Armitage et al., 2008). The cyclical PM&E process involving problem identification, taking action, monitoring, and reflecting and redefining the problem, inherently affords the opportunity to strengthen and deepen the contributions of primary stakeholders and rights holders, through shared learning, joint-decision making, co-ownership, etc. (Jackson & Kassam, 1998; Onyango, 2018). An underlying objective of PM&E is to achieve a more holistic perspective of an initiative, by involving a diverse set of stakeholders and rights holders (Stem et al., 2005). Participation may also increase the likelihood that community sustainability decisions are perceived to be locally relevant, holistic and fair, while accounting for a diversity of values and needs and recognizing the complexity of human-environmental interactions (Jackson & Kassam, 1998; Richards et al., 2004). Participation can empower stakeholders and rights holders through the co-generation of knowledge with researchers and increasing participants’ capacity to use this knowledge (Greenwood et al., 1993; Okali et al., 1994). Participation may also increase the likelihood that community sustainability decisions are perceived to be relevant, holistic and fair, while accounting for a diversity of values and needs and recognizing the complexity of human-environmental interactions (Richards et al., 2004). Challenges of Participatory M&E Participation in M&E is time consuming because it requires involvement in all or most phases of the overall project, including planning, implementation, monitoring, and evaluation. Projects with community involvement may have more difficulty coordinating meetings due to differing schedules, travel requirements, etc. Community members will have livelihood, family, and perhaps other organizational obligations (Lasker & Weiss, 2003). Unequal power structures among decision makers, scientists, and local community members are an inherent challenge of PM&E. It is important to think critically about power throughout the PM&E cycle, taking into account not only the power relations between the project leads and the community, bu
← Previous Chapter Next Chapter →