← Back to Book Detail

8 Evaluating OER (8/8) -- CAUL Open Educational Resources Professi...

Browse
100%

8 Evaluating OER

8 Evaluating OER Learning outcomes By the end of this chapter, you will be able to: - Evaluate the quality of OER using specific criteria OER quality evaluation Last chapter you explored a variety of OER Collections and how to search for OER. Watch the below video to revise this content and begin to understand the importance of quality and evaluation. Watch: How to find and evaluate OER [6:04 mins] Note: Closed captions are available by clicking on the CC button in the video. Similar to evaluating any type of retrieved information, It’s important to ask some critical questions when selecting OER. This is to ensure retrieved OER match the need identified. Below are some key areas of evaluation: Authority - Who is the author? Accuracy - Is the information accurate? Are there major content errors or omissions? - Are there spelling errors or typos? Relevance - Does the OER cover the topics you need covered? - Is it relevant to the context being studied? - Could it be adapted to be made relevant? Audience - Is the OER suitable for your cohort? - Is it developed for a more advanced, or more general, level? Quality of content - Is the educational content accurate, current, and of a high academic standard? - Was it developed by qualified experts at a reputable institution? Production quality - Is the information clear and understandable? - Is text appropriately formatted, are images and videos in high resolution, and is audio clear? - - If not, can you improve the quality of the material, or create a high-quality version? - - Do the design features enhance learning? Accessibility - Is the OER accessible and inclusive of students from diverse backgrounds, or with disabilities or learning difficulties? For example, do images have captions or alt text? - Are colour-blind-friendly diagrams used? - Is the language accessible? - If the OER is not accessible, can you adapt it to make it so? If not, you will need to find an accessible alternative. Interactivity - Does the resource encourage active learning and class participation? - Are there opportunities for students to test their understanding of the materials (e.g. a video with embedded questions?) Licensing - Is the OER licenced in such a way that you can do what you need with it? - For example, if you plan to adapt the OER, you’ll need to avoid Creative Commons licences with ND (No Derivatives) elements. Checklists and rubrics When evaluating OER, it can be helpful to use a checklist or rubric. Here are some examples: - Queen’s University Library – OER Guide - Queen’s University Library offers an Open Educational Resource guide with checklist information. - iRubric: Evaluating OER rubric - Rcampus (a commercial resource) provides an example of how to evaluate an OER using a rubric. - University of Queensland – Evaluate OER - University of Queensland Library offers an Open Educational Resource guide with an OER evaluation checklist. - Federation University – Evaluating OER - Federation University Library of
← Previous Chapter Next Chapter →