← Back to Book Detail

46 Evaluating for Credibility (45/82) -- From College to Career: A Handbook for S...

Browse
54%

46 Evaluating for Credibility

46 Evaluating for Credibility Robin Jeffrey; Christina Frasier; and Teaching & Learning, University Libraries Learning Objectives - Understand whether a source’s author can address a topic with authority. - Identify strategies for assessing a source’s credibility. Next, you’ll be evaluating each of the sources that you deemed relevant. What are the clues for inferring a source’s credibility? The focus of this section is on evaluating online, since we all do so much of our research online. However, much of the same critical thinking skills you use to evaluate online sources can be used for books, too. And remember, the more you take these steps, the faster it goes because always examining your sources becomes second nature. Factors to Consider Evaluating a website for credibility means considering the five factors below in relation to your purpose for the information. These factors are what you should gather clues about and use to decide whether a site is right for your purpose. - The source’s context on the web. - Author and/or publisher’s background. - The degree of bias. - Recognition from others. - Thoroughness of the content. How many factors you consider at any one time depends on your purpose when seeking information. In other words, you’ll consider all five factors when you’re looking for information for a research project or other high-stakes situation where making mistakes have serious consequences. But you might consider only the first three factors at other times. The source’s context on the web The context of your source can help you determine whether or not it is credible. On a website, check pages labeled About Us, About This Site, Mission, Site Index, and Site Map, if available. (If such pages or similarly labeled ones don’t exist, it may be a sign that the site may be less trustworthy.) Ask yourself these questions to gather clues that will help you decide the source’s context: - Is the site selling products and/or services (even if there are articles and other useful information, too)? Perhaps it’s a retail, service center, or corporate site. - Are there membership applications and requests for contributions of money or time anywhere on the site? They’re usually a sign that you’re on a site that promotes particular ideas or behavior – in other words, they’re an advocacy site. - Do postings, articles, reports, and/or policy papers give a one-sided view or multiple views on issues, people, and events? If they’re one-sided, the site is probably a commercial site or an advocacy group. If the information is even-handed and includes different sides of an issue, the site is more likely to be on the library/museum, school, or mainline U.S. news. Sites there usually provide information designed to educate rather than persuade. Newspapers online or in print usually do have editorial pages, however. But labeling opinions as such helps keep mainline U.S. news sources credible. Author If they’re available, first take a look at pages called su
← Previous Chapter Next Chapter →