← Back to Book Detail

4.7. Police Misconduct, Accountability, and Corruption (33/50) -- Introduction to the U.S. Criminal Justic...

Browse
66%

4.7. Police Misconduct, Accountability, and Corruption

4.7. Police Misconduct, Accountability, and Corruption Tiffany Morey and Kate McLean Learning Objectives This section will cover police misconduct and accountability. After reading this section, students will be able to: - Discuss the different corruption types in policing - Explain the difference between a meat eater and a grass eater - List the different ways an officer engages in noble-cause corruption - Describe how a police officer uses stereotyping on the job - Discuss the importance of having a reliable internal affairs division/bureau - Explain why excessive use of force is difficult to quantify Critical Thinking Questions - How are grass eaters and meat eaters different? - What is noble cause corruption? - Why are there misunderstandings of police accountability? - What are the functions of an internal affairs division/bureau? - What happens if a police department shows a pattern of excessive use of force? Corruption Types Police officers have a considerable amount of power. With one fell swoop, an officer can seize a person’s freedom. An officer is also given the authority to carry a gun, and for protection of either the officer or a person, take the life of a citizen as well. These decisions are rarely easy, and at times, there are officers who not only overstep their legal boundaries but jump directly into the pit of corruption. One of the problems with police corruption, including unjustified uses of force, is that there are few accurate, comprehensive, and public-facing measures. As discussed previously in the text, the FBI’s “Use of Force” dataset captures less than half of all police agencies in the United States; the best data on use of force (both legal and illegal) is collected by non-profit organization, who source their information from the media. Moreover, police corruption ranges across a broad spectrum, and may not come to administrators’ attention – or result in punishment. Finally, as will be discussed in subsequent sections, police subculture is defined by values that stress loyalty and suspicion of outsiders (and even police management.) The “blue wall of silence” represents a powerful barrier to addressing corruption in police ranks. Of course, no matter the profession, corruption can occur. In an occupational context, corruption refers to the misuse of one’s position for personal gain. What may be unique – and dangerous – about corruption in law enforcement is the power that individual law enforcement officers may leverage. Whether seeking personal advantage, money, or simply a sense of power, Grass Eaters In 1970, The Knapp Commission coined the terms ‘meat eaters’and ‘grass eaters’ after an exhaustive investigation into New York Police Department corruption. Police officers that were “grass eaters” accepted benefits. Whether it was a free coffee at the local coffee shop, fifty percent off lunch, or free bottled water from the local bodega, these cops would take the freebie, and not attempt to do the “right thing” b
← Previous Chapter Next Chapter →