My understanding is that Google didn't like Oracle's licensing policy for using the JRE in Java ME so it just rewrote it using its own JVM specification that mimics the JRE but behaves a little bit differently, especially when it comes to making things more efficient and more secure.

So, if my understanding is correct, it means that when javac is ran on some Java source code and compiled into "binary" byetcode, a compliant JVM will interpret that bytecode different than Dalvik will (in some cases). This is the inherent difference between Dalvik and other (compliant) JVMs.

If anything I have said so far is incorrect, please begin by correcting me!

Now, if Android came with its own compiler (which it might), and compiled Java source in a different (Dalvik-compliant) manner than javac, then I could understand how some code (not compiled with the Android SDK) would not run on an Android device:

MySource.java --> javac --> MySource.class (JRE-compliant) --> JVM --> running Java app
MySource.java --> android-compiler --> MySource.class (Dalvik-compliant) --> Dalvik JVM --> running Android app

However, it looks like you use javac to compile Android apps!?!? So it looks like we have this:

MySource.java --> javac --> MySource.class (JRE-compliant) --> JVM --> running Java app
MySource.java --> javac --> MySource.class (JRE-compliant) --> Dalvik JVM --> running Android app (???)

If javac is used to compile all sources into bytecode, then why is it that Dalvik can't run some types of Java code?

I asked a very similar question yesterday and although it was technically answered (after re-reading my question I see I was simply not specific enough) no one was able to explain what it is that's inherent to Dalvik that makes it impossible to run Java code from projects like G

Edit
Report