When I do a job search for a .Net developer it's all mostly the same stuff .Net, ASP, SQL Server, CSS, Javascript, AJAX, and maybe C#. Whereas with Java you may have to have Java, Sturts, Spring, JSF, EJB, a RDMB, Eclipse RCP, CSS, Javascript, AJAX, Rest, any number of specific Java APIs. Is it easier to be a .Net developer since the technologies are so focused? Or does it just seem that way?
Something else important to consider is that you can get "branded" as a .NET or Java developer midway into your career. At that point, it becomes more difficult to switch, since (understandably) you have less experience in the one you didn't choose. Thus far, I have been alternating, but that comes with its own set of problems where you have gaps in experience with new libraries/frameworks on each side.
Any other thoughts on the pros/cons of developing Java vs. .NET? For instance, what types of companies, cultures, pay, etc?
For me, it seems like .NET tends to be in more established companies whereas Java is used by a lot of startups (given the low cost entry and open source libraries available). The pay is comparable, but .NET seems a little higher. Java development might be a little more fun given that you get to play with new frameworks more often and aren't as restricted to specific paradigms.