KnowledgeHub
Questions
Tags
Users
Search
Alex Rivera
|
Logout
Edit Question
Title
Body
I have a project using Git where I've branched off of master to rename a directory. The rename in the branch works as expected. When I switch back to the master branch the directory has its original name, but there's also an empty directory tree with the name that I changed it to in the branch. Is this the expected behavior? Am I missing a step? Do I just need to delete these empty directory trees as they appear? I know Git doesn't track empty directories and that may be a factor here. My current workflow is: # create and checkout a branch from master /projects/demo (master) $ git checkout -b rename_dir # update paths in any affected files # perform the rename /projects/demo (rename_dir) $ git mv old_dir new_dir # add the modified files /projects/demo (rename_dir) $ git add -u # commit the changes /projects/demo (rename_dir) $ git commit -m 'Rename old_dir to new_dir' I get to this point and everything is as expected: # old_dir has been renamed new_dir /projects/demo (rename_dir) $ ls new_dir The issue comes when I switch back to master: /projects/demo (rename_dir) $ git checkout master # master contains old_dir as expected but it also # includes the empty directory tree for new_dir /projects/demo (master) $ ls old_dir new_dir new_dir is an empty directory tree, so git won't track it - but it's ugly to have there.
Tags (comma-separated)
Save Edits
Cancel