O.k, this is really irritating, I had noticed previously that the code generated by WPF for loading XAML resources did not appear to use strong names and therefore may be problematic for scenarios where you need to support side by side versions of WPF assemblies.

This has turned out to be the case, and it's now causing me problems - I have a plug-in system which is supposed to support side by side installation of plugins which differ only in their version numbers (their assembly versions). This of course can be supported by .NET since assemblies are determined to have different identities even if they have the same DLL filename, provided that they are strongly named and either have a different public/private key OR have a different assembly version number.

Now, if we look at the code generated for windows and usercontrols by visual studio, we see in the auto-generated file the following:

/// <summary>
/// InitializeComponent
/// </summary>
[System.Diagnostics.DebuggerNonUserCodeAttribute()]
public void InitializeComponent() {
    if (_contentLoaded) {
        return;
    }
    _contentLoaded = true;
    System.Uri resourceLocater = new System.Uri("/Sensormatic.AMK1000.Panel;component/views/servicepanelui.xaml", System.UriKind.Relative);

    #line 1 "..\..\..\Views\ServicePanelUI.xaml"
    System.Windows.Application.LoadComponent(this, resourceLocater);

    #line default
    #line hidden
}

Notice the line where the resource locater is created - it is using a relative URI which does not specify the strong name or the version of the assembly which contains the xaml resource.

I thought maybe LoadComponent would check the calling assembly's identity and use it's public key and version details or perhaps check the identity of the assembly which contains the type for the 'this' parameter.

It appears this is not the case - if you have two assemblies with different version numbers (but the sa

Edit
Report