I don't think it is possible to exclude direct dependencies either (at least, nothing is mentioned here).
The best thing you can do is to enclose the desired dependencies for each case into different profiles (as suggested already), but, you'll need to create two "mutually exclusive" profiles with the one of them "active by default". The most reliable way to achieve this is by using a parameter for your profile activation e.g.
<profiles>
<profile>
<id>default-profile</id>
<activation>
<property><name>!exclude</name></property>
</activation>
<dependencies>
dependency-A
dependency-B
...
</dependencies>
</profile>
<profile>
<id>exclude-profile</id>
<activation>
<property><name>exclude</name></property>
</activation>
<!-- exclude/replace dependencies here -->
</profile>
</profiles>
Then using "mvn [goal]" will use profile "default-profile", but "mvn [goal] -Dexclude" will use profile "exclude-profile".
Note that using 'activeByDefault' instead of a parameter for your "default" profile might work in some cases but it also might lead to unexpected behavior. The problem is that 'activeByDefault' makes a profile active as long as there is no other active profile in any other module of a multi-module build.
answered 2011-04-09T00:47:35.843