KnowledgeHub
Questions
Tags
Users
Search
Alex Rivera
|
Logout
Edit Question
Title
Body
Is the absence of std::array<T,size>::array(const T& value); an oversight? It seems mighty useful to me, and dynamic containers (like std::vector ) do have a similar constructor. I am fully aware of std::array<T,size>::fill(const T& value); but that is not a constructor, and the memory will be zeroed out first. What if I want all -1 's like this guy ?
Tags (comma-separated)
Save Edits
Cancel