KnowledgeHub
Questions
Tags
Users
Search
Alex Rivera
|
Logout
Edit Question
Title
Body
After reading Martin Fowler's Mocks Aren't Stubs , I've discovered I've been practicing TDD in the "mockist" fashion. But I'm wondering if even in mockist TDD if one can take mocking too far. Here's an updated example in Python-style pseudo-code: def sync_path(self): if self.confirm_or_create_connection(): self.sync(self.dirpath) The confirm_or_create_connection() method creates a connection to a server. I tested a method similar to this in two tests, both of which mock confirm_or_create_connection() and sync() (even though they're both methods in the same class). In one test the mock confirm_or_create_connection() returns True and the test confirms that sync() was called, and in the other the mock confirm_or_create_connection() returns False and the test confirms that sync() was not called. Is this reasonable? Or should I mock the objects that confirm_or_create_connection() and sync() call? (I have other tests of both of these methods that already do this.) Please don't answer the question by explaining that I should be practicing "classical" TDD instead. That's an answer to another question: Should I practice mockist or classical TDD?
Tags (comma-separated)
Save Edits
Cancel