KnowledgeHub
Questions
Tags
Users
Search
Alex Rivera
|
Logout
Edit Question
Title
Body
I want to implement Scrum, but I can't decide on a Sprint length. Ken Schwaber seems to relate that 30 days it the defacto... but I can't imagine waiting 30 days without the possibility of changing direction or reprioritizing. Our projects usually only last 1-3 months using the waterfall method and moving to Scrum would probably mean less opportunity to fine tune. I was thinking about 1 week sprints, but this seems like Scrum Micro Management. Having 2 week sprints would probably be ideal, but I want to know if others out there were able to implement this successfully. What are the downsides? Is it more work/less work/same about of work to manage a team with shorter sprints? BTW... 3 week sprints seem odd to me, who does a 3 week sprint? Why not just make it 4 weeks. ;)
Tags (comma-separated)
Save Edits
Cancel