KnowledgeHub
Questions
Tags
Users
Search
Alex Rivera
|
Logout
Edit Question
Title
Body
I'm flip-flopping between naming conventions for typedef 'ing the boost::shared_ptr template. For example: typedef boost::shared_ptr<Foo> FooPtr; Before settling on a convention, I'd like to see what others use. What is your convention? EDIT: To those nesting the typedef inside Foo , doesn't it bother you that Foo is now "aware" of how it will be passed around? It seems to break encapsulation. How about this: class Foo { public: typedef std::vector<Foo> Vector; }; You wouldn't do this now, would you? :-)
Tags (comma-separated)
Save Edits
Cancel