I think the implementation below fill the bill quite gracefully.
'''singly linked lists, by Yingjie Lan, December 1st, 2011'''
class linkst:
'''Singly linked list, with pythonic features.
The list has pointers to both the first and the last node.'''
__slots__ = ['data', 'next'] #memory efficient
def __init__(self, iterable=(), data=None, next=None):
'''Provide an iterable to make a singly linked list.
Set iterable to None to make a data node for internal use.'''
if iterable is not None:
self.data, self.next = self, None
self.extend(iterable)
else: #a common node
self.data, self.next = data, next
def empty(self):
'''test if the list is empty'''
return self.next is None
def append(self, data):
'''append to the end of list.'''
last = self.data
self.data = last.next = linkst(None, data)
#self.data = last.next
def insert(self, data, index=0):
'''insert data before index.
Raise IndexError if index is out of range'''
curr, cat = self, 0
while cat < index and curr:
curr, cat = curr.next, cat+1
if index<0 or not curr:
raise IndexError(index)
new = linkst(None, data, curr.next)
if curr.next is None: self.data = new
curr.next = new
def reverse(self):
'''reverse the order of list in place'''
current, prev = self.next, None
while current: #what if list is empty?
next = current.next
current.next = prev
prev, current = current, next
if self.next: self.data = self.next
self.next = prev
def delete(self, index=0):
'''remvoe the item at index from the list'''
curr, cat = self, 0
while cat < index and curr.next:
curr, cat = curr.next, cat+1
if index<0 or not curr.next:
raise IndexError(index)
cu
answered 2011-12-03T11:20:54.800