KnowledgeHub
Questions
Tags
Users
Search
Alex Rivera
|
Logout
Edit Question
Title
Body
Destructors aren't virtual by default to not hurt when its not needed, which is fine. But in case of a base class derived class scenario, is there any use case for not having a virtual destructor ? If not could it be possible (does it make sense) for the compiler to complain if a class derives from a base class which has a public non virtual destructor (or no destructor) defined. And not just warn about it.
Tags (comma-separated)
Save Edits
Cancel