KnowledgeHub
Questions
Tags
Users
Search
Alex Rivera
|
Logout
Edit Question
Title
Body
When using the pImpl idiom is it preferable to use a boost:shared_ptr instead of a std::auto_ptr ? I'm sure I once read that the boost version is more exception friendly? class Foo { public: Foo(); private: struct impl; std::auto_ptr<impl> impl_; }; class Foo { public: Foo(); private: struct impl; boost::shared_ptr<impl> impl_; }; [EDIT] Is it always safe to use std::auto_ptr<> or are there situations when an alternative boost smart pointer is required?
Tags (comma-separated)
Save Edits
Cancel