KnowledgeHub
Questions
Tags
Users
Search
Alex Rivera
|
Logout
Edit Question
Title
Body
So far, I always prefered to use Hibernate directly rather than JPA 1.0, because JPA was lacking some of the important features I needed and Hibernate provided: Criteria API, second level cache, unidirectional OneToMany and a few others. Now, with the advent of JPA 2.0 and all the new features that come with it and that were initially missing in JPA 1.0 ( http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Java_Persistence/What_is_new_in_JPA_2.0%3F ), I wonder if there is still a need to use Hibernate directly. What's your opinion? What's left in Hibernate 3.5 that I can't do with JPA 2.0 ?
Tags (comma-separated)
Save Edits
Cancel