KnowledgeHub
Questions
Tags
Users
Search
Alex Rivera
|
Logout
Edit Question
Title
Body
I'm changing some Haskell code from using lists to sets. I understand everything required, I think, but I'm not sure how to pattern match on sets. Lists have this nice literal syntax that seems hard to emulate with the Set constructor. For example, I might have some code like this: foo [] = [] foo x = other_thing How can I write this code so it uses Sets instead of lists?
Tags (comma-separated)
Save Edits
Cancel