KnowledgeHub
Questions
Tags
Users
Search
Alex Rivera
|
Logout
Edit Question
Title
Body
MySQL ResultSets are by default retrieved completely from the server before any work can be done. In cases of huge result sets this becomes unusable. I would like instead to actually retrieve the rows one by one from the server. In Java, following the instructions here (under "ResultSet"), I create a statement like this: stmt = conn.createStatement(java.sql.ResultSet.TYPE_FORWARD_ONLY, java.sql.ResultSet.CONCUR_READ_ONLY); stmt.setFetchSize(Integer.MIN_VALUE); This works nicely in Java. My question is: is there a way to do the same in python? One thing I tried is to limit the query to a 1000 rows at a time, like this: start_row = 0 while True: cursor = conn.cursor() cursor.execute("SELECT item FROM items LIMIT %d,1000" % start_row) rows = cursor.fetchall() if not rows: break start_row += 1000 # Do something with rows... However, this seems to get slower the higher start_row is. And no, using fetchone() instead of fetchall() doesn't change anything. Clarification: The naive code I use to reproduce this problem looks like this: import MySQLdb conn = MySQLdb.connect(user="user", passwd="password", db="mydb") cur = conn.cursor() print "Executing query" cur.execute("SELECT * FROM bigtable"); print "Starting loop" row = cur.fetchone() while row is not None: print ", ".join([str(c) for c in row]) row = cur.fetchone() cur.close() conn.close() On a ~700,000 rows table, this code runs quickly. But on a ~9,000,000 rows table it prints "Executing Query" and then hangs for a long long time. That is why it makes no difference if I use fetchone() or fetchall() .
Tags (comma-separated)
Save Edits
Cancel