KnowledgeHub
Questions
Tags
Users
Search
Alex Rivera
|
Logout
Edit Question
Title
Body
While somehow versed in VCS (regular svn, git and git-svn user) I can't seem to wrap my head around this peculiar SVN behavior. Whenever I need to rename a directory in my SVN working copy from an otherwise 'clean' state - i.e svn status returns nothing and all other modifications have been commited - like so (which is what the svn doc suggests): svn mv foo bar svn commit SVN complains loudly: Adding bar Adding bar/toto Deleting foo svn: Commit failed (details follow): svn: Item '/test/foo' is out of date As you wish: svn update Which gives: C foo At revision 46. Summary of conflicts: Tree conflicts: 1 There's a tree conflict, while no third-party change happened . Obviously, the only way to get out of this tree conflict mess is generically (from the svn red book): svn resolve --accept working -R . svn commit Renaming it remotely on the repo then updating my working copy seems quite braindead: url=$(svn info | grep -e '^URL:' | sed 's/^URL: //') svn mv $url/foo $url/bar svn update Is there a sanctioned, more streamlined way to rename a folder that I'm missing? What is the root cause behind that particularly surprising tree conflict state?
Tags (comma-separated)
Save Edits
Cancel