Edit Question - KnowledgeHub

Title Body

I am reading existing posts on Generics at SO. If Generics has so many advantages like Type safety, no overhead of boxing/unboxing and it is fast, why not always use it? Why would you ever use a non-generic object instead? Edited (Question further extended below) I am a bit confused. The last time I read about Generics, a few months ago, I read that if the Type in the parameters is variable, Generic should be used in order to prevent errors. What I seem to be reading now, though, is that Generics limit implementation to a fixed Type, while a non-generic object allows you to define parameter types at run-time. Please help me see what I'm missing? Secondly, using these kinds of constructs in proper OOP designs (Generics, etc.) are helpful when you are working in a team and your code is shareable. For a lone programmer with a small scale, who knows what Type has to come in the parameter, it seems like there is no need to worry, and little difference between using a Generic or Non-Generic type. Is this accurate?

Tags (comma-separated) Cancel