Alex Rivera | Logout

Are scripts "open source" by definition?

Asked 2009-01-09T03:04:06.650
9

The other day, I tweaked a script for a friend's World of Warcraft addon. He was surprised that you could edit the addons—that they were "open source." (Word of Warcraft addons are written in the Lua scripting language) I found myself wanting to say "Sure you can—all scripts are 'open source'."

Is that true? Sure, some scripts can be compiled to bytecode, but aren't almost all scripts interpreted? That is to say, doesn't the device interpreting the script need the "source," by definition?

Edit
Report

1 Answer

4

No.

"Open source" is not the same thing as being able to view the source code; open source licencing is about the legal right to derive works from that source code.

If you take someone else's work, modify and redistribute it without their explicit consent, then you are infringing upon their copyright, and breaking the law.

answered 2009-01-12T22:46:00.623

Your Answer