KnowledgeHub
Questions
Tags
Users
Search
Alex Rivera
|
Logout
Edit Question
Title
Body
This question came to mind after reading the answer to this question; which basically made the point that List<T> has no virtual methods, since it was designed to be "fast, not extensible". If that's the design goal, why didn't the original design including sealing the class? (I know that's not possible now, seeing how that would break a lot child classes within client code)
Tags (comma-separated)
Save Edits
Cancel