Alex Rivera | Logout

performance difference between openlayers, decarta and google maps

Asked 2011-03-04T14:58:40.400
9

We have recently been transitioning our company mapping system from Google map, first to deCarta and then to OpenLayers. We have found that OpenLayers and deCarta are remarkably slower than Google Maps when many elements (several thousand) are added to the map (pins with bubbles on click). Google has the Marker Manager which appears to make it faster, but what I can't figure out is how this cuts down the memory usage or whatever to make it perform so much better. It's driving me nuts because we do the same thing with both OL and deCarta as we do with Google and the others are so slow. Does anyone have any experience in working with these systems?

I know that Google is the massive giant of mapping technology and therefore has put enormous amounts of money into the system, so it's not surprising that it's faster. I just want to know HOW if at all possible.

Thanks!

Edit
Report

1 Answer

0

I've experienced the same issue with deCarta, the browser goes slower with 800 approx pins elements (with bubble on click), I asked Krishna Vanka(who no longer works at deCarta) about this but I don't get any solution so we build a new filter by zoom parameter and coordinates painting elements and caching offscreen elements so we can get on memory about 2000 pins, of course, is not the best way but it works.

The problem in our system (GPS WebApp) with geometries and pins it's that are drawn by users so extra image layers is not a possibility.

answered 2011-10-17T16:17:54.667

Your Answer