Edit Question - KnowledgeHub

Title Body

Ok, this is a question I'm asking, not as in demonstrating good coding practices (this actually could be considered a bad practice) but rather in regards to 'can' it be done at all. That said, in VB.NET you implement an interface like this... Sub SomeInterfaceMember() Implements ISomeInterface.SomeInterfaceMember End Sub while in C# you do it explicitly like this (which can only be called via the interface)... void ISomeInterface.SomeInterfaceMember(){} or more simply, implicitly like this (in which case you can call it directly, or via the interface)... void SomeInterfaceMember(){} // <-- This name matches the interface member However, regarding VB, you can also do this, using any name you want for the member... Sub SomeRandomMemberName() // <-- This name doesn't match the interface member Implements ISomeInterface.SomeInterfaceMember End Sub In other words, the method that handles the implementation can have a completely different name than the interface's member name. I'm just wondering if there's something similar to this in C#. (Yes, I know I can simply do an explicit interface, then access it via another 'wrapper' member with a different name that simply delegates to it, but in VB.NET, you do both with a single method.) So can that be done? Mark

Tags (comma-separated) Cancel