KnowledgeHub
Questions
Tags
Users
Search
Alex Rivera
|
Logout
Edit Question
Title
Body
I repeatedly hear BDD enthusiasts advocate using both SpecFlow and MSpec in the same project. Apparently SpecFlow is more suitable for outside-in/UI tests. (For example, web tests which simulate mouse-clicks, etc, using WatiN or something similar.) Apparently MSpec is more suitable for unit-tests. Now my question is - why use two frameworks which are incredibly similar and do virtually the same thing? Why not instead: Choose one BDD framework and stick with it. Use it for outside-in/UI tests, as intended, Write your unit-tests normally, with an established unit-testing framework (such as NUnit, MSTest, etc)? I thought the reason we adopt BDD is so we can test behaviours, which are driven externally , by means of integration tests. I don't see how/why this applies to unit tests.
Tags (comma-separated)
Save Edits
Cancel