i have followed the pattern on this site to hook up ninject and nhibernate to my asp.net-mvc3 site.

Here is the code in my global.aspx.cs:

 internal class ServiceModule : NinjectModule
{
    public override void Load()
    {
        var helper = new NHibernateHelper(connectionString);
        Bind<ISessionFactory>().ToConstant(helper.SessionFactory)
            .InSingletonScope();

        Bind<IUnitOfWork>().To<UnitOfWork>()
            .InRequestScope();
        Bind<ISession>().ToProvider(new SessionProvider())
            .InRequestScope();
        Bind<IIntKeyedRepository<FAQ>>().To<Repository<FAQ>>()
            .InRequestScope();
       }

the issue is that i now need to do Update() and Add() in my controllers;

I have this as my controller code:

    public FAQController(IIntKeyedRepository<FAQ> faqRepository, IUnitOfWork unitOfWork)
    {
        _faqRepository = faqRepository;
        _unitOfWork = unitOfWork;
    }


  [Authorize]
    [AcceptVerbs(HttpVerbs.Post)]
    [ValidateInput(false)]
    public ActionResult AddFAQ(FAQ contact)
    {
        var c = new FAQ {Question = contact.Question, Answer = contact.Answer};
        _faqRepository.Add(c);
        _unitOfWork.Commit();
        return RedirectToAction("Index");
    }

my main question is that it feels wrong to pass in Iunitofwork in the constructor as many other actions don't need it. I only really need it for the actions where i do updates and inserts into my db. Since i am using ninject IOC on the link above it seems to say to pass this unitofwork object through IOC.

So, is there a better more optimized way to using the UnitOfWork pattern with IOC in asp.net-mvc that does call beingtransaction for every method in my contr

Edit
Report