Edit Question - KnowledgeHub

Title Body

Apologies if this is a dumb question, but if I create 2 modules that both require('http') and my main application that requires both modules, or requires modules that in turn require both modules, while also requiring 'http' for its own purposes, do I end up with three instances of the http module, each locked within the scope of a different closure, or does node rewrite things to avoid this? In other words, do I end up with an app that has: // main app creates a closure containing a local instance of http, an instance of proxy1 // and an instance of proxy2, both of which are functions returned from closures that have instances of http in scope var http = require('http'), httpProxy1 = require('./proxy1'), httpProxy2 = require('./proxy2'); /* ... do stuff with http, using proxy1 or proxy2 where appropriate ... */ // proxy1 creates a closure containing a local instance of http and exposes a single public method var http = require('http'); module.exports = function (foo) { /* ... do stuff with http ... */ } // proxy2 creates a closure containing a local instance of http and exposes a single public method var http = require('http'); module.exports = function (foo) { /* ... do stuff with http that has nothing to do with the stuff proxy1 does ... */ } If I also want to use proxy1 independently, it makes sense to have it as a module, but on even a small project, this could lead to many modules that all require core modules repeatedly, especially http and fs

Tags (comma-separated) Cancel