KnowledgeHub
Questions
Tags
Users
Search
Alex Rivera
|
Logout
Edit Question
Title
Body
For people suggesting throwing an exception: Throwing an exception doesn't give me a compile-time error, it gives me a runtime error. I know I can throw an exception, I'd rather die during compilation than during runtime. First-off, I am using eclipse 3.4. I have a data model that has a mode property that is an Enum. enum Mode {on(...), off(...), standby(...); ...} I am currently writing a view of this model and I have the code ... switch(model.getMode()) { case on: return getOnColor(); case off: return getOffColor(); case standby: return getStandbyColor(); } ... I am getting an error "This method must return a result of type java.awt.Color" because I have no default case and no return xxx at the end of the function. I want a compilation error in the case where someone adds another type to the enum (e.g. shuttingdown) so I don't want to put a default case that throws an AssertionError, as this will compile with a modified Mode and not be seen as an error until runtime. My question is this: Why does EclipseBuilder (and javac) not recognize that this switch covers all possibilities (or does it cover them?) and stop warning me about needing a return type. Is there a way I can do what I want without adding methods to Mode? Failing that, is there an option to warn/error on switch statements that don't cover all of the Enum's possible values? Edit: Rob: It is a compile error . I just tried compiling it with javac and I get a "missing return statement" error targeting the last } of the method. Eclispe just places the error at the top of the method.
Tags (comma-separated)
Save Edits
Cancel